- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:11, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- IMagic OS (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable kubunutu distro. The only links are blogs and trivial (for our purposes) mentions at distro directories. There seems to be a single review of this but the providence of that site is undetermined. No reliable sources = no article. --Cameron Scott (talk) 15:11, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 19:20, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Reposting what I put on the article's talk page: I can find extremely little independent media coverage. [1] is one of the few. The rest are obvious spam blogs, Linux distro list sites, and forums (many appearing, again, to be spam posts, such as [2]). -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 02:36, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Lacks reliable sources that consider it to be an important distribution. There are too many Linux clones for us to cover all of them. (Ubuntu itself is obviously important, and has lots of press coverage, but this one has a long way to go). EdJohnston (talk) 06:29, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn -- samj inout 16:27, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.