- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus to delete.--Kubigula (talk) 23:24, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- IMedicor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
non notable website Asod123123 (talk) 13:33, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 14:53, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 14:53, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I think that the associations that this site has partnered with demonstrate notability. --Eastmain (talk) 20:03, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Will the closing admin please also note that the nominator's contributions show him/her to be a single-purpose account user, using it solely to nominate stuff for deletion.--Vox Humana 8' 00:27, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It only started in October 2007 and has partnered with recently created business promotion sites. Its only reference citation is to a new promotional blog with a "recent posts" section at the end. Isn't there an unaffiliated reference citation available for this company? All it is doing is jumping into the health care fray, trying to get a piece. There is no indication that it is superior to the many others that are doing the same thing. Mattisse 23:46, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. There are a few non-press release sources if you check google, e.g. [1] and [2]. It's a specialized service so it's unlikely to hit the general press in a big way. But the claims are credible that they quickly signed up 18,000 or so physicians, and being the first HIPAA-compliant patient medical record sharing portal sounds like a pretty big deal that could become a significant part of the practice of medicine. If the product never catches on we can revisit this in a few months; if it does the notability is a given.Wikidemo (talk) 18:19, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.