- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh 03:43, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The article isn't encyclopedic. It doesn't have much momentum going for it. E_dog95' Hi ' 07:02, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 13:21, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, It is is not clear what the article is about and has a title that only those who know about it could find. Victuallers 13:29, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete. The text of the article discusses a technology known as InVANET, which has its own article already (and is also nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InVANET). The last line sums up this topic, INADVENC, as "a google group specifically discussing on InVANET." The article doesn't discuss its actual topic, and the actual topic isn't encyclopedic or notable in any way, shape, or form. ZZ Claims ~ Evidence 15:03, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom et al. --Evb-wiki 17:06, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.