- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 00:25, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
- INetClean (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Filtering software that doesn't meet WP:NSOFT. No reliable secondary sources provided, I can't find any, and the article gives no reason to think they exist. —Cryptic 23:56, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - software article of unclear notability, lacking significant coverage in reliable sources. Refs provided are blogs and company PR, not WP:RS. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional.Dialectric (talk) 14:57, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 22:51, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.