Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IP Leveraged Solutions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:17, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

IP Leveraged Solutions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Business jargon. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Feezo (Talk) 04:28, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as non-notable. I cannot find significant discussion establishing the notability of this term. Also, the article is currently only a dictionary definition. - DustFormsWords (talk) 05:06, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.
• Delete. A rambling essay about making money fast on the Internet. Meaningless title. IP Levergate Solution is the a value-added service where a company uses Intellectual property (IP) to create a Solution that would not have been possible without this specific IP. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 18:01, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I am trying to create a page around the concept of leveraging a better idea or "Intellectual Property" to do business in a better way (not necessarily a more profitable way). I know it needs more information. I am hoping to get some help. The content will get better. Protecting and using Intellectual property in all facets of life is a concern in many areas such as medication, software development, process improvement, etc. Eagle team (talk) 10:43, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, not-notable jargon. Nakon 21:36, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, primarily as dictionary definition of jargon. (Much of the article is already covered at Intellectual property.) OSborn^arf_{contributionatoration} 17:16, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have removed/edited some parts of the article which were either unclear or restatements of information available elsewhere (such as the list of different types of IP) which I feel did not help the article. OSborn^arf_{contributionatoration} 17:24, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.