- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 17:27, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- IP SLAs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete not WP:NOTABLE LES 953 (talk) 02:26, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Could it use some references and citation to articles discussing what IP SLA is and how it is implemented? Sure. Non-notable? Definitely not. Lahnfeear (talk) 02:48, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 13:27, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete 100% of the article is their sales material. No article left to discuss once that gets deleted. Zero references. North8000 (talk) 17:04, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete the article using Wikipedia title conventions is service level agreement. We should eschew obfuscation and not use alphabet soup in titles. That SLA article needs more sources and wikilinks, but do not see any sources in this one either, so perhaps nothing to merge. It seems to be a cut-n-paste from a 2006-era Cisco document by single-purpose account Special:Contributions/Ipsla. Would be happy with a merge too, if indeed this acronym is a useful redirect. W Nowicki (talk) 17:04, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.