Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IPhone and iPod touch homebrew installers
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 21:44, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article should be on wiki, it documents a factual set of applications. It is far less contentious than may other articles. I do not feel that it should be censored out on spurious grounds —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.106.145.127 (talk) 10:20, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- IPhone and iPod touch homebrew installers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Completely unsourced original research -- nothing worth salvaging. Blaxthos ( t / c ) 01:07, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails WP:N (and WP:WEB when applicable). Lәo(βǃʘʘɱ) 01:43, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: simply non-notable. If we let that article there, it might become a magnet for advertising. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 02:46, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per above, simply not notable pretty much describes what is happening here. RockManQ (talk) 03:42, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - or perhaps just a comment. I noticed AppTapp redirects here. AppTapp (the Installer.app link) was the first iphone app installer, received a lot of tech press coverage, and was well known among software developers and v 1.0 iphone users. For that reason I believe it passes WP:WEB. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sashaman (talk • contribs) 08:14, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Can you back up the "tech press coverage" claim? If so, then it would probably pass WP:WEB. Lәo(βǃʘʘɱ) 21:15, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not a how-to guide. Erik the Red 2 ~~~~ 01:24, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.