Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IRRT

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 23:16, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

IRRT

Delete another unsourced one-liner about some technology from Intel. Yes, Intel's big, great, wonderful, etc....but not each piece of technology that emanates from Intel is inherently notable, and this has no sources and minimal context: basically Intel has some technology that's like someother technology. Not very encyclopedic. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 17:20, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No indication of notability. Jujutacular ^talk_contribs 17:30, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 18:20, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This could really be speedied as it makes no assertion of notability. Mangoe (talk) 19:54, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Unfortunately, speedy deletion for lack of notability (WP:CSD#A7) specifically excludes software: "This criterion applies only to articles about web content and to articles about people, organizations, and individual animals themselves, not to articles about their books, albums, software and so on." Help change it at Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 18:14, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable. However, that's not criteria for speedy (see Mangoe). Should have been prodded. --MrStalker ^(talk) 16:26, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.