- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. enochlau (talk) 14:37, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I saw this sitting in CSD for a while and wasn't sure what to do with it. The only author blanked the article, but that's not a criteria for a speedy because the author hasn't requested it be deleted. The article does contain stuff that doesn't seem nonsensical, but as a secret society, my personal opinion is that this article can be deleted for being too secret. --Deathphoenix 17:17, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; The information in the article is not supported by the referenced link. Tom Harrison (talk) 17:23, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as empircal athiesm. — JIP | Talk 18:09, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. We don't want this information to be known to the public. ;) Seriously, if the author blanked it, one could assume that s/he wanted it to be deleted but didn't know the procedure. I've seen that happen and asked the editor. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 18:19, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete before the feds catch on! - FrancisTyers 20:19, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as unverifiable. —Quarl (talk) 2005-12-31 02:59Z
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.