- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep and add references. Davewild (talk) 19:33, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
In my opinion the article has no use- it should be deleted Olliyeah (talk) 20:49, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:42, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - looks like WP:IDONTLIKEIT to me ViperSnake151 15:08, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Perhaps, but if so it's WP:IDONTLIKEIT with no references asserting its notability... still, it's probably a...
- Keep based on good faith that the article's info is generally true, although it need references (trust but verify). Epthorn (talk) 15:46, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: pending any genuine policy grounds the nom might wish to advance to warrant deletion. Are there any? RGTraynor 17:22, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep at this point. True, the article needs some references and, if possible, some expansion, but the reason for bringing this AfD doesn't swing it for me. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 21:14, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep songs by notable artists often have their own articles. --Djsasso (talk) 00:25, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
merge I say if it is indeed one Avril Lavigne songs then put it in with her article under a sub-header labeled songs. --Pluto2spacebeam (talk) 03:41, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.