- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. EdJohnston (talk) 03:48, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Ian Pincombe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Likely doesn't meet the notability guidelines. There were no references provided, either. A google search reveals nothing that would make this person notable. Also, there was no hits for news. Crazy Boris with a red beard (talk) 22:08, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- BelovedFreak 22:10, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- BelovedFreak 22:10, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is an edit of the previously existing Ian Devine page with more information and an expanded biography. That was not listed for deletion. He is a musician of some renown. — Preceding unsigned comment added by COBRPINDAR (talk • contribs)
- Unsure, leaning towards delete. Clearly not notable as an academic and manifestly fails WP:PROF. No mention of his scholarly work anywhere, including GoogleScholar, GoogleBooks, WoS, PublishOrPerish. May or may not be notable as a musician. I have no experience with music-related AfDs so I'll leave it to others to vote on this issue. However, after reading WP:MUSIC, it does not appear that he satisfies WP:MUSIC either. Nsk92 (talk) 02:43, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless citations from reliable sources are added to comply with the verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 14:12, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment There is something odd about the link to this discussion from the Ian Pincombe article. I couldn't get here from there. It must not have been set up right. That is a big problem because AFD might have to be done over again.Divinediscourse (talk) 19:09, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete I agree with Nsk92 that this guy might be notable. However, the lack of verifiable sources puts him over the edge into the delete category.Divinediscourse (talk) 19:09, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.