- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 23:16, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Ibrahim Shahid (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
"known for getting 23 A grades in his Cambridge O Level exam, breaking the world record". This falls under WP:NOTNEWS and WP:BLP1E. Christopher Connor (talk) 22:06, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 22:17, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Agree that this fails WP:NOTNEWS. Truthsort (talk) 23:55, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete A classic case of WP:BLP1E. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 01:39, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Per WP:BLP1E. Joe Chill (talk) 16:29, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:NOTNEWS. If the subject of World records in Cambridge O Level exam isn't notable enough for an article, the record holder surely isn't. Not sure if WP:BLP1E applies here. Don't we have articles on people notable for nothing but world records in track & field, swimming, etc? causa sui (talk) 08:27, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete statistical firsts are not notableCurb Chain (talk) 02:34, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.