- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Pigman☿ 04:05, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I originally called tihs site otable,, but it's dropped down on Alexa massively. Articles pretty much a super stub, too. Computerjoe's talk 18:38, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - It's had independent articles written about it (these, two are mentioned on the article talk page, and there's more where that came from), which means it satisfies the criteria of WP:WEB. It also seems that these articles are fairly substantial works rather than flash-in-the-pan news coverage, which means that it passes the temporary notability test. I doubt it's ever going to be a great article, but I don't think it needs to be deleted, either. --jonny-mt 04:43, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - The Mark Cuban connection gives a tenative claim to notability per WP:WEB criteria #3. Sources found: CNet story from 2005 & Forbes. Google News has additional non-trivial coverage. Caknuck (talk) 18:04, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.