Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ice (Durst book)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. NAC. Joe Chill (talk) 12:51, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ice (Durst book) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence this book meets criteria of WP:NBOOK. Contested prod. ... discospinster _talk 17:58, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Review Ctrl-F -> Durst [1] finalist for Norton Award and the author is a well known children's sci fi author. The article is written very poorly but it meets WP:NBOOK.--Savonneux (talk) 22:09, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:28, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete the article. I am trying my best to make sure it is good enough to be kept here. StarLegacy (talk) 21:05, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Published by a major publisher, Simon & Schuster. Nominated for the Norton Award. --MelanieN (talk) 13:45, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Book by very notable author. Would presume that the book itself is notable unless evidence otherwise is presented. JulesH (talk) 20:44, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.