Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iceland Pure Spring Water
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was No consensus. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-12 01:15Z
- Iceland_Pure_Spring_Water (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Not notable with 13 GHits, one of which is to this entry in Wikipedia. Entry reads like advertisment Markb 14:53, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Week Keep Keep and wikify. Cocoaguy 従って contribstalk 14:58, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Why? Nothing indicates it is being sold on a noteworthy scale. Punkmorten 15:12, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- It's at every Walgreens in America. If I put that in the article, it would be flagged as an advertisement. There are pages for Jolt Cola, Martinelli's Sparkling Cider, Aquapod, Imsdal, Apollinaris, etc that are sold in far less locations and have much less notoreity. Closure2000 03:01, 31 January 2007 (UTC) — Closure2000 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- Note Closure2000 is the creator of this article SkierRMH 03:21, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I didn't think Wikipedia was so elitist. I've been editing anonymously for a while now, but with the first article I try to do, I am shunned as a "one purpose" author. I was trying to add an item that wasn't already on here (hard to do) and I assumed my favorite brand of water, which you can get at 5500 stores nationwide in the states would be fair game. Closure2000 03:33, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- What makes this any more noteworthy than other spring water brands? And why does this article need a link from Spring (hydrosphere)? Delete. --Elkman - (Elkspeak) 16:13, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Every other water has a page. I don't think it should be deleted based on that.Closure2000 03:32, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
RELISTING TO GAIN BETTER CONSENSUS. Metros232 19:09, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Advertisement. Delete. Anthony Appleyard 19:18, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep as it stands, looks like a bland press release. Needs a broader picture to be a decent article, but could be notable in itself if sold across America. Totnesmartin 20:25, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep (and part of the reason it is so weak is that Closure2000 is pushing it so much, which makes me raise an eyebrow or two). Frankly, I looked over a lot of the bottled water articles, such as Ozarka and they aren't much better. I'd let it go and hope for more improvement in this area.--Wehwalt 20:32, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.