Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ig Publishing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:46, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ig Publishing

Ig Publishing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable, many published works are reprints Deunanknute (talk) 16:07, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by nominator - meets WP:CORPDEPTH

• Keep. Notable publisher, despite awful sub-stub of an article. See, for example, Publishers Weekly's 10-year retrospective of the company,[1] and articles from both Publishers Weekly[2] and the Washington Post[3] about the Lizzie Skurnick Books imprint. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 16:55, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  21:44, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  21:44, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  21:44, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  21:44, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep – Meets WP:CORPDEPTH. Source examples include [4], [5], [6]. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:59, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (spiel) @ 20:13, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰. VMS Mosaic (talk) 03:27, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.