Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ikram's unlimited calender
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was SNOW delete Jclemens (talk) 03:43, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Ikram's unlimited calender (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Delete. Unreferenced article, unsubstantiated claim, contested prod. WWGB (talk) 13:04, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. As above. an unremarkable claim - Speedy Delete? noq (talk) 13:13, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, for what are obvious reasons. Tried to prod it myself. eaolson (talk) 13:17, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Per nom. It's so blatant, I would have been tempted to nominate for a speedy deletion. Favonian (talk) 13:18, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no source, no indication of notability, nothing in Google or News. JohnCD (talk) 13:19, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Thats terrible, Two sentences, No references, No sources, In the bin with it! Harlem675 13:24, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment First time new article from a new user from Pakistan. Welcome to Wikipedia, Tuopuo. It takes time to learn the rules, but the most important one is that you have to show where the information comes from. Even then, not everything is notable enough for an article. Mandsford (talk) 15:17, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Subcomment Not quite first time. Have a look at this older version of the user talk page. Favonian (talk) 15:23, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, appears to be made up. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:29, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Per WP:MADEUP. Joe Chill (talk) 15:55, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.