Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Image of the Beast
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete · Katefan0(scribble) 21:37, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Tagged as {{nonsense}}, but doesn't meet the WP definition of such. Doesn't seem to meet any other of the CSD either, so AfD gets to deal with it. No vote from me. -Splash 03:29, 10 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as OR/Biblecruft. MCB 06:20, 10 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Reserve Possibly convertable into a useful article, but possibly OR. I'll have to think about it. --Apyule 06:25, 10 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, unless someone is going to clean it up. It's pretty terrible right now. -- Kjkolb 10:53, September 10, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete without prejudice, probably a valid topic, but mentioning where it appears in the bible only (with over half the entry being quotes) doesn't make it an article. - Mgm|(talk) 11:19, September 10, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Original research, if I understand this correctly. -- llywrch 23:15, 10 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, nothing that isn't OR or already covered in Book of Revelation and Number of the Beast (numerology). Gazpacho 23:28, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I, Chris Nance, yeshua2000@yahoo.com, created this article.
I am new to Wikipedia and will do whatever necessary to clean this up or make it conform to Wikipedia standards. This is not original research. It is mentioned in Revelation 13. The Mark of the Beast is also mentioned there and you have allowed that entry. The Image of the Beast is different topic than the Mark of the Beast and the Number of the Beast and is a valid topic in Christian eschatology This is not covered in any other entry in Wikipedia. I would like the opportunity to finish this article. Thank you.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.