- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete g11, advertising for one company's products. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:54, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Immersive book (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete This is thinly disguised advertising for Squeaky Oak, an ebook publisher that is probably closely linked to the author (see also this edit). Of course, the term "immersive book" is used every now and then but it's not, as the article suggests, used to refer to this company's concept. (As far as I can tell the company isn't notable in the Wikipedia sense of the term) Pichpich (talk) 14:00, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Per nom. Also WP:NN product. A great example of why Wikipedia needs a speedy deletion criterion for articles about products that do not assert the product's notability or importance. Toddst1 (talk) 14:11, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per G11, if doesn't qualify - simply delete on the basis of WP:NOTPROMO and/or WP:N. Ipsign (talk) 14:13, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This is marketing, not anything notable. An article might be justified on immersive books but this isn't it. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:20, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 16:18, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.