Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imo.im (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete. The article is virtually identical to the one discussed at the previous AfD. JamesBWatson (talk) 21:27, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Imo.im (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Once deleted web service/software, that fails WP:N. Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 11:01, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 11:03, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 January 5. Snotbot  t • c »  11:13, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete and salt as a re-creation of previously deleted content. The version deleted after discussion last time was very similar to this text. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:45, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • It is out there since August 2011. I thought WP:SPEEDY only qualifies for articles which were recently created. But I agree on the general idea. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 17:00, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have tagged the article for G4 speedy deletion. Chris the Paleontologist (talk ⋅ contribs) 21:20, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.