Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imperative Reaction

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. —bbatsell ¿? ✍ 01:23, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Imperative Reaction (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Article does not assert notability per WP:MUSIC. No independent references cited. Nv8200p talk 03:40, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. ${\displaystyle \sim }$ Lenoxus " * " 15:07, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:MUSIC. M1ss1ontomars2k4 ^{(T | C | @)} 04:32, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Primary sources, hasn't charted or been otherwise recognized, too many redlinks, fails WP:BAND. Realkyhick 03:21, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. They're touring with the apparently notable VNV Nation. They're pretty small-time still, but notable. Ventifax 07:00, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is no mention of the extent of the tour. Was it a national tour? Even then, the band should stand on its own notability snd not ride the coat tails of another goup. -Nv8200p talk 11:34, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WjBscribe 00:42, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep has no external sources, but seem to have released enough albums on a decent label to pass WP:MUSIC Criteria for musicians and ensembles number 4--Dacium 04:23, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Doesn't even need to be weak -- criteria #4 of WP:MUSIC states that they have to have at least two releases on an important indie label, and this band has three. Rockstar915 17:57, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep agree with previous poster. furthermore I'd suggest that an 'expand' or 'citation needed' tag have been place on the article before it was listed here. It is, I think, more constructive than slapping an AfD on it before any discussion takes place. cheers, Casliber | talk | contribs 20:59, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.