Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Improvised Action Collective
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Secret account 04:12, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Improvised Action Collective (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Apparently non-notable organization. Tagged for notability since 2008. Atlantima (talk) 13:31, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete only one blog source doesn't satisfy the WP:GNG... unless somebody can dig something else up. We'll have the full story... at 11! 13:55, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable group and it doesn't seem likely to become notable. MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:12, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails GNG: no RS, not notable enough for inclusion in an encyclopedia. czar · · 16:35, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.