Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imran H Sarker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 01:18, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Imran H Sarker

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fail to meet the requirement. Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 10:43, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Arr4 (talk) 06:54, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Arr4 (talk) 06:54, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Arr4 (talk) 06:54, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Well he doesn't seem to be very uncontroversial... but I've cleaned up the article a bit and added one more reference. In addition, I've found with some minimal searching, I've found this link which lists atleast 20 articles featuring him directly, so I don't think he's not really unnotable. – Nahiyan8 (talk | contribs) 13:12, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per WP:ONEEVENT, only known for his roles in 2013 Shahbag protests. --Zayeem ^(talk) 11:38, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
He's been in DhakaTribune news as recent as September 2014 which goes beyond the Shahbag protests. Further link: Priyo news – Nahiyan8 (talk | contribs) 13:59, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom and WP:ONEEVENT. Happiest persoN (talk) 10:33, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as clearly ONEEVENT - Being a doctor and making a baseless claim doesn't grant you an automatic right to an article, Can't find any evidence of notability beyond this minor crap so will have to say Delete. –Davey2010^Talk 00:38, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.