Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InConJunction

InConJunction (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable fan convention. There is no reliable sourcing here that proves the event/organization is notable in its own right. I already removed a section that consisted an overview of past conventions, with a lot of namedropping. Google News provides nothing at all, except for a program note or two from the local paper, which convention tells us is not enough to establish notability. Drmies (talk) 15:48, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The convention is notable for the following reasons:
1. It was the first science-fiction convention in Indianapolis, established in 1981
2. It has spanned four decades as a regular event, marking it of cultural significance to the city
3. It has been, since its beginning, run by a volunteer organization that includes charity work as part of its yearly programming
4. The convention has attracted notable authors and artists that are respected in the science-fiction and fan communities. No name-dropping intended, but these guests lead credence to the importance of the event to the community Mikhaine (talk) 16:14, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Additional consideration is that similar events/organizations maintain a wiki presence, which include past events and summarize programming. The following examples are both active and inactive conventions. Note also that the InConJunction page has been in use since 2005.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windycon
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NorthAmeriCon_%2779 Mikhaine (talk) 16:41, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Pointing at other articles is NEVER helpful--unless they are GAs or FAs. The things you say--well, if reliable secondary sources (not just the Indy Star) said it, we'd have something to go on. Drmies (talk) 17:10, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]