Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InMediaRes Productions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 21:11, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

InMediaRes Productions

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No verifiable evidence provided demonstrating significant coverage of the company in reliable sources independent of it per WP:General notability guidelines and WP:CORP. The references present that mention the company all appear to be press releases or otherwise company generated, and therefore not independent. Delete. DGaw (talk) 23:20, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, press releases are an unsatisfactory substitute for RS. Alessandra Napolitano (talk) 04:30, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No coverage in reliable sources and the article reads like a summary of press releaases which is all that I could find for sourcing. -- Whpq (talk) 16:38, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as lacking in-depth coverage by independent third party sources. If such sources are added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:14, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.