Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InTouch Messenger

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 21:23, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

InTouch Messenger

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject doesn't have the depth of coverage in secondary sources to meet WP:GNG Flat Out talk to me 04:54, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete because, unfortunately, there isn't any good coverage with searches here, here with nothing as well at Books, highbeam and thefreelibrary. SwisterTwister talk 05:59, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Pacific News from Hawaii had covered this.
Melbourne Startups:
Melbourne Startups: http://melbourne.startups-list.com/?sort=new
CrowdFundingPR:
http://www.crowdfundingpr.org/intouch-secure-peer-peer-messaging-now-kickstarter/
xsspider (talk) 05:49, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As Flat Out said, the subject doesn't have the depth of coverage in secondary sources to meet WP:GNG. --Dodi 8238 (talk) 08:50, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:49, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - software article of unclear notability, lacking significant WP:RS coverage. Refs provided are download links and an incidental mention, and a search failed to turn up any further RS coverage.Dialectric (talk) 05:22, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.