Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Index to tables of contents of Reader's Digest

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete. Rob Church ^{Talk | Desk} 00:36, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that the Reader's Digests tables of contents would be a series of massive copyright violations, but also note that Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:25, August 31, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete as above. --Carnildo 07:46, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nominator. KissL 10:51, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - DavidWBrooks 11:08, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Copyvios DV8 2XL 12:07, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I do not believe that Tables of Contents would constitute copyvios. This is more an issue of Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Roodog2k 16:07, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• delete ne --TimPope 17:37, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.