- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Olaf Davis (talk) 15:35, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Indian Fall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:MUSIC; no significant coverage in independent, third-party sources; no releases at all on notable labels. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 12:26, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I can't find in-depth coverage for this band in reliable sources; does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:BAND. Gongshow Talk 19:32, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 02:08, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this band. Joe Chill (talk) 03:58, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above; only given links are myspace and the band's own webpage. Chutznik (talk) 06:56, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.