Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indiana Daily Student
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Consensus that the topic is notable. (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 14:01, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Indiana Daily Student (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The Indiana Daily Student does not appear to meet Wikipedia's established notability guidelines. Three of the existing references merely point to the main page of various social media accounts of the IDS, four point directly to the organization's self-published website (including one that links directly to a donation page), one links directly to a press release from the University of Indiana, and the remaining one provides no information about the 'IDS except the name of the paper and that the IDS had an affiliation with the source's publisher. I really can't find any references to the IDS from a reliable, independent source that has covered the paper in a substantial way way. As such, I think this article's topic fails to meet WP:GNG and should be deleted. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 07:54, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 07:54, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete clearly fails the minimum threshold of multiple, indepdent reliable sources covering it in detail.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:36, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Some independent relaible sources I found include [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] Reywas92Talk 00:36, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Reywas92 has provided a cornucopia of qualifying sources. Zero doubt that this meets GNG. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 04:55, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.