- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 19:16, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Indicast (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
it is not notable, and there are no references whatsoever ChiragPatnaik (talk) 08:07, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:46, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:46, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete:As per nom. "One of the first" does not qualify as "first" , no mention of viewership to justify claims of popularity. --Deepak D'Souza (talk • contribs) 08:27, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete lacks 3rd party references. Fails to establihs notability.--Rtphokie (talk) 15:49, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.