Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indigo cantor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:13, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No claim to notability. Contested speedy-bio. Wickethewok 01:19, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:BIO and WP:VANITY --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 02:28, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete nn, van Celcius 02:47, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as non-notable. 6 Google hits. Royboycrashfan 02:58, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, vanity, nn. --Terence Ong 05:03, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Google turns up eight hits. T K E 07:13, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete - db-bio was contested only by anon users. — ciphergoth 15:32, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete --Tone 17:07, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete --Edwy 17:08, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete. There's no such thing as a contested speedy; only admins may remove speedy tags. Speedy deletion is NOT prod. Warned the anons with {{drmspeedy}}. --Rory096 17:50, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - But, to above, we should allow speedy contestations just in case a speedy would not be warranted. —Cuiviénen, Saturday, 1 April 2006 @ 18:13 (UTC)
  • Comment. That's what admins are for. --Rory096 00:40, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not notable. Barry Zuckerkorn 19:07, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• This is not a speedy delete, as it contains "She has been the guest speaker and panel member at many entertainment summits and forums including the worlds first entertainment media forum", which is a claim of notability. (And yes, I'm an admin.) However, delete as unverifiable, probable hoax. Stifle 21:32, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 03:08, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete nothing on Google --Snailwalker | talk 21:48, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.