Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infamous Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 03:47, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Infamous Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Delete - disputed prod. There do not appear to be independent reliable sources that attest to the notability of this subject. Otto4711 23:38, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Fails WP:V; no reliable, third-party sources have been provided. The edit summary for the prod removal stated "Mobb Deep is notable". Ok, but WP:NOTINHERITED. --Geniac 04:30, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - It is a record label and has plenty of artists just look at Mobb Deeps myspace profile it links to most of them.Tru Soulja 05:39, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Myspace profiles are not reliable sources. Otto4711 12:09, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 16:20, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. This fails WP:N. The number of artists is irrelevant; as is MySpace. It seems unlikely ever to properly meet WP:V either, with a lack of non-trivial secondary sources [1]. Adrian M. H. 20:37, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.