Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infestdead (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 02:46, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Infestdead (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lacks coverage in 3rd party reliable sources. No significant improvement since AFD was started (and never closed) nearly 7 years ago. RadioFan (talk) 16:02, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I'm doing a pretty thorough search and I'm not finding anything that would be considered a reliable source. Everything I find has been put out by the band or their publicists. As far as the previous nom arguments go, being sold on Amazon doesn't give you automatic notability and notability is not inherited. I think at most this would be a redirect to Dan Swanö with a brief mention on his article. It doesn't look like this band ever really made it big enough to become notable.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 05:43, 6 November 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →Στc. 00:23, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No significant RS coverage. Alessandra Napolitano (talk) 01:56, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.