Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infinite Sarcasm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Dakota 00:09, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notable, lots of unverifiable info Subwayguy 00:13, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - WP:OR (not saved by the continual use of "quite"). Yomangani^talk 00:39, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - 525 hits on google, most of which aren't related, no alexa ranking. Ultra-Loser ^{Talk | BT sites} 02:05, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Ultra-Loser's ghits and alexa rank. Clearly fails WP:WEB. -- IslaySolomon 03:52, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. MER-C 08:44, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nominator. JIP | Talk 09:24, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nominator and WP:WEB or WP:OR. --Charlesknight 14:16, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. --Maelnuneb (Talk) 18:00, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. -- Rglovejoy 23:20, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per all above.UberCryxic 23:22, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep it as a nonexistent article For those who are unwilling to rack your brains (if any) in order to understand the forementioned paradox, it means delete. Reason: per all above. -- physicq210 03:49, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.