Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inflectional morphology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Inflection. And whoever wants to merge (and source!) stuff should feel free do so from the history.  Sandstein  19:56, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Inflectional morphology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Stub that contains no substantive information not covered more thoroughly in Inflection. Duoduoduo (talk) 17:18, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:41, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge and redirect to Inflection. —Angr (talk) 09:36, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 06:31, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Inflection. It's essentially the same concept, and currently links there. Cnilep (talk) 08:40, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge with Inflection. Eduemoni^↑talk↓ 12:23, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.