Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infolinks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 03:37, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Infolinks

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP, sources are all blogs or press releases. McGeddon (talk) 08:31, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:57, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:57, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:58, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as entirely an advertisement, only focusing with what either the company says about itself or others republishing these same words, the article is an advertisement and it's clear these were the intentions from the beginning (note the several accounts focusing with this one article). SwisterTwister talk 03:03, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- 100% spam. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:04, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
delete per all above - David Gerard (talk) 09:49, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: an entity which advertises others, appears to be in need to advertise itself, but chose wrong platform. fails WP:NCORP too. Anup [Talk] 16:42, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.