- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedily deleted, per CSD G7 at creator's request.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:09, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Infomaster (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promotion for non-notable software product. I have been unable to find any significant coverage. The somewhat generic name does not help, but they're not even the top Google hit for the term. Haakon (talk) 13:40, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Infomaster is an established product in Singapore. It is in the top 10 page for google.com.sg and the number one link on yahoo.com.sg for "erp software". It is one of the notable singapore developed softwares that has been around since 1987. More information on the product can be found in the Singapore Infocomm portal. http://www.infocommsingapore.sg/isg/index.php/web/content/company?show=cba&node_id=2301 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Terry.g.mason (talk • contribs) 14:11, 13 April 2010
- Delete I have just tried searching for "erp software" on google.com.sg, and Infomaster did not appear in the first 100 hits, whether I tried a worldwide search or restricted it to pages from Singapore. It must have moved down very quickly, if the above was correct when it was written. When I tried searching yahoo.com.sg for "erp software" Infomaster was the third hit, not first. However, whether first, third, or two hundredth, this is the company's own website, and so not an independent source. I have also tried the more specific search "erp software" Infomaster on both Yahoo and Google on each of sg, uk, and us, and did not find anything that could remotely be called significant independent coverage. There are plenty of hits for advertising directory listings and similar sites, but nothing substantial anywhere at all except for the company's own site. As for the link given in the above post, it is a link to a business directory listing at the bottom of which is the note "Disclaimer: All content published on this page was provided by the company listed". JamesBWatson (talk) 14:26, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom. Fails WP:WEB and meets and/or exceeds WP:SPAM. --Ronbo76 (talk) 16:27, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:16, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.