Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Informal communication

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 23:36, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Informal communication (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

I'm not entirely sure it's a straight dicdef, but it's more a dicdef than it can ever be an encyclopedic article because the concept of informal communication has so many uses. Travellingcari (talk) 21:25, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. The concept is too vague to make an encyclopedia article. JohnCD (talk) 22:46, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. This seems to me to be crypto-spam of some sort, since the article seems to refer to vague titles like "Project Communications Management", of the sort I find tell-tale signs of spam and bad writing. Doesn't seem to even attempt to exhaust the subject, which would involve such things as linguistic registers and the like. There might be an article that could be written about this subject; this is not it. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:49, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.