Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Informal social control
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-11 05:38Z
- Informal social control (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) -- (View AfD)
- Delete Original research with no claims otherwise Shaundakulbara 03:35, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 13:27, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. I'd say redirect to some other behavior/sociology page, but not sure since the one here is a mix of several. So just kill it. DMacks 18:36, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Smacks of WP:OR, no references/citations. The way the first sentence reads, looks like it might have been cut out of a longer work, as the referent ("These" rules) is missing. SkierRMH 22:41, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. This is also explained in the Social control article.--m3taphysical 18:19, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.