Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infra (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, may be editorially redirected.  Sandstein  19:54, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Infra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This is probably better to put in the Wiki-dictionary or some other project not in wikipedia. consider merging or moving? Katanada (talk) 20:26, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Dictionary entry. --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 21:53, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete WP:NOTDICDEF. 'nuff said. --/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 22:27, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete Note this page has been speedily deleted before via WP:CSD#A5. --/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 22:28, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and protect to prevent future AfD's. Dictionary entry; some good writing, just not encyclopedic.--Koji†Dude ^(C) 23:34, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Dictionary entry. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 02:38, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment- We have ut infra and vide infra at List of Latin phrases (full), perhaps we should redirect there. shoy 18:00, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect - no way to write anything more on this (read: this is never going to be more than a dictionary entry). Lundse (talk) 12:09, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.