Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ingemar Lindh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:50, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ingemar Lindh

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Ingemar Lindh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Orphaned article with little amount of sources available regardless of medium to demonstrate enough notability to pass WP:GNG. Was deleted via PROD in the past only to be recreated by a single-purpose account. MimirIsSmart (talk) 12:17, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Theatre and Sweden. MimirIsSmart (talk) 12:17, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:43, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Called the "father of collective improvisation in the dramatic arts" [1], and described here [2]. Is also indexed in the VIAF as having publications in Sweden I'd imagine there are more in the native language. Oaktree b (talk) 14:18, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: There's a Swedish scholarly source here, as well as the sources found by Oaktree b. With this I think he meets WP:GNG. --AlexandraAVX (talk) 11:08, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, per above. Also, if anyone got access there's an article in Svenska Dagbladet from 10 July 1997 which seems interesting, one in Göteborgs-Posten 5 July 1997 and potentially one in Arbetet (Västsvenska editionen) 7 February 1970, to mention a few, but I can only see some snippets from home. /Julle (talk) 12:26, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep There seem to be better sources in this discussion than there is on the page. Might be a good idea to integrate some of these sources and content onto the page. Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 21:48, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.