- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:04, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Inj3ct0r (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested prod. Doubtful claim to notability; hacking Facebook isn't notable in itself unless it was written about in reliable sources, and I can't find that it was. (The sources provided on the site don't meet WP:RS.) The other content of the article reads like a bit of a vanity piece. bonadea contributions talk 17:29, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - although the fact that Facebook's server was hacked would be good to have in ces. the Facebook article, I can't verify it using reliable sources, and this group fails WP:GNG as there's is no significant coverage in reliable sources. Claritas § 18:30, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:25, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:25, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Haven't heard of them, nothing on news websites mentions the group... Fridae'§Doom | Talk to me 00:09, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.