Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inline Mechanics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 13:43, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Inline Mechanics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet notability requirements and is borderline advertising. Deletion proposal tag was removed by anonymous user and replaced by bot which was again removed by anonymous user. Nominating for deletion. Tejanse (talk) 05:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The only reference provided is a press release which does not establish notability because it is not independent. The press release must not have worked, because the Google News Archive shows no coverage of the company. Therefore, it is not notable. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 05:06, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:56, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:57, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination and Cullen. Article is about an engineering company that specializes in building machines and providing automation/equipment integration services within the solar photovoltaic industry. Note that SolarPark Manufacturing Equipment, Ltd. should face the same fate as this article, as it is the previous name for the same business. That too is referenced only to a single routine story announcing the opening of a joint venture facility. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 19:42, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages for the reason stated above; another name for the same business:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.