- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sources were not forthcoming, but as always in the event that they later appear a new, sourced article (in userspace!) is usually well received at deletion review. Aaron Brenneman (talk) 11:52, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Innobuzz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of WP:notability. No independent WP:reliable sources. Just reads like a bad company webpage. noq (talk) 20:08, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per lack of third party sources. I didn't get any third party mentions on Google and Yahoo. SwisterTwister talk 23:44, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — —Tom Morris (talk) 07:53, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as notable. There seems to be enough coverage to satisfy the general notability guideline, You may want to check Archives of Google News for Press Coverage, FB Page of the company. Mainly, I am from the Information Security Industry and understand the notability of the brand. Sonakshi87 (talk) 14:09, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Yet another Multi-national information security training company advertising on Wikipedia. I find nothing that looks like substantial independent coverage in the five Google News hits. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:32, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Below mentioned are some other Information Security companies/programs listed on Wikipedia and their Alexa Ranks:
| SANS Institute | www.sans.org - 34,652 |
|---|---|
| CompTIA | www.comptia.org - 67,591 |
| Information Systems Audit and Control Association | www.isaca.org - 69,149 |
| OSCP | offensive-security.com - 75,370 |
| EC-Council | www.eccouncil.org - 124,970 |
| (ISC)² | www.isc2.org - 162,739 |
| ISECOM | www.isecom.org - 909,674 |
| Council of Registered Ethical Security Testers Certified Consultant | crest-approved.org - 4,705,99 |
Innobuzz is 52,060 ie Right about CompTIA and not something which just came up. Refer History Graph. - 122.173.230.114 (talk) 08:06, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Please read WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Alexa rankings are not a WP:notability criteria so are not relevant. noq (talk) 09:47, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as notable. Innobuzz is the parent company of Secfence Technologies which uncovered privacy flaws in Facebook and other popular websites. Source of Third Party References: http://www.google.com/search?sclient=psy&hl=en&biw=1600&bih=769&tbs=ar%3A1&tbm=nws&source=hp&q=secfence+technologies&btnG=Search- 42.108.99.125 (talk) 16:16, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Innobuzz does not seem to be mentioned in that search - do you have a specific link for that? It would not necessarily make innobuzz notable though. noq (talk) 17:12, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Found this on the website of Secfence - http://www.secfence.com/services Please check the Footer. - Sonakshi87 (talk) 17:30, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment A recent award given by NBC (Newsmaker Publication, owner of Afternoon Voice) to Innobuzz. Reference: http://www.prlog.org/11472067-innobuzz-wins-best-ethical-hacking-training-award.html & https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=172042576183394&set=a.134433773277608.36816.115207178533601&type=1 Please check, Not sure if this meets the Notability Criteria. Also got to know that they feature a Information Security section on a TV Channel NDTV_24x7 during a Technology show, will try to get a reference video shortly. - Sonakshi87 (talk) 17:47, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 04:44, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete None of the sources I could find meet the reliability or independence criteria (the parent company's website is not independent, facebook is not reliable, etc). I see nothing to indicate that notability is met PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 23:56, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.