- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 21:58, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
- Innoosy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of notability. Page created by Ubiclouder (talk · contribs) whose userpage shows that they are clearly representing a company. This page seems to be able some process invented by the company. Pure self-promotion. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:28, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Article is random writing by author. No source of credibility or notability. Light21 22:24, 17 September 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Light2021 (talk • contribs)
- Delete - Subject does not meet general notability requirements. Meatsgains (talk) 22:26, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:57, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy delete and delete the copy on their sandbox too. Also, someone should block the creator at least until they agree on a username change. Blythwood (talk) 05:13, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as spam, original research and violating WP:PROMO. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:45, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - Looks like advertising to me. AlphaBetaGammaDeltaEpsilonZeta 12:48, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.