- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. North America1000 10:10, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- InnovaDE (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about non-notable software. Fails WP:GNG for lack of available sources. - MrX 03:36, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:55, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:55, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete – Software (linux distro) article of unclear notability, lacking independent refs. Article was created by an SPA with a name similar to the developer, so article is likely promotional. A search turned up no significant RS coverage of this software.Dialectric (talk) 16:51, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Even a few searches found nothing even close to talking about this subject. Not notable software. SwisterTwister talk 05:12, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience t 01:40, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience t 01:40, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.