Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Innovations vector

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Innovation (signal processing). I see no benefit from re-listing the article as the consensus is clear for a redirect (including from the nominator). (non-admin closure) st170e^talk 01:22, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Innovations vector

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It does not add anything to Innovation (signal processing). Marcocapelle (talk) 12:37, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, shouldn't it become a redirect, rather than being deleted outright? This is not my field, but from a cursory search, the term "innovations vector" seems frequently used as-is. — Gamall Wednesday Ida (t · c) 14:16, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Probably yes. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:32, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Innovation (signal processing). This is just the name for the multivariate version of a scalar innovation measure and a WP:BEFORE search reveals that this term is used in papers and monographs in the time series and signal processing literature. Hence it is a plausible search term and a reasonable candidate for a redirect. --Mark viking (talk) 22:14, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.