Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Input Web Wizard

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:16, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Input Web Wizard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

non notable website Asod123123 (talk) 13:39, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 14:50, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Will the closing admin please also note that the nominator's contributions show him/her to be a single-purpose account user, using it solely to nominate stuff for deletion.--Vox Humana 8' 00:26, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --Bongwarrior (talk) 09:11, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete While the nominator is clearly a SPA, they don't seem to be maliciously so. This nomination appears to be in good faith, as the article doesn't really establish why the software is notable and suffers from some advertising issues besides. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 13:38, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - fails WP:WEB. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:54, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete seems to fail WP:WEB and is a bit spammy for my taste.--Sallicio^{${\displaystyle \color {Red}\oplus }$} 00:57, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.