Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inquiry learning

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Closed as moot. Colonel Warden found the Obvious Right Thing. I redirected the page, and therefore this can be closed for lack of continuing jurisdiction. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:36, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Inquiry learning (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

It's not at all clear what's going on in this article, but someone added an AfD tag without completing the process, so I'm doing that now. Personally, I was tempted to just speedy it, so I'd say delete as a non-article. GTBacchus^(talk) 23:41, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep This phrase makes it sound very unproffesional: "People discover more they know and more they dunno." However, the content is not biographical and could potentially be something important. This could always be redirected to something related to Socratic method also. -download | sign! 23:53, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete It may be a real topic but this is worthless as even a stub. DGG (talk) 04:49, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Inquiry-based learning which seems to be the same topic. Colonel Warden (talk) 11:35, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.