Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Insane Spider Productions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 11:38, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notable one-person machinima production company formed only this year. Article was written by founder. Googling for "Insane Spider Productions" gives only 11 unique hits. "Mud Monsters from Mars", one of the productions, gets zero hits. Prod tag was removed without comment. — TKD::Talk 02:33, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been added to the list of machinima deletions. — TKD::Talk 02:40, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete non-notable vanity page. Opabinia regalis 02:59, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Non-notable vanity. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 04:49, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. WP:NOT for self-promotion.--Drat (Talk) 06:10, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. SynergeticMaggot 07:07, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above Just zis Guy you know? 12:02, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. per nom. Neil916 22:47, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. R.E. Freak 02:48, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. "An American 'company'"? Even the article itself hesitates to call the business a company. 11 ghits, per TKD's evidence, seems to confirm vanity page.--Firsfron of Ronchester 19:21, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• keep I've searched Wiki quite a bit and seen pages no different than this. Like 'Furcadian Wrestling Federation', that's some guild on Furcadia. What's the difference besides the fact that ISP will make entertainment available to everyone while FWF will only appeal to certain others who have Furcadia? Also the reason I hesitate to call ISP a company is because isnt a company something that has an infastructure and makes a profit? ISP is completely profit free. It's used to entertain people.TwistedArachnid 04:50, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - The "just as non-notable/less notable stuff is on Wikipedia" argument is not a reason to keep. It is rather a reason to nominate the other stuff for deletion too.--Drat (Talk) 05:18, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as non-notable. I agree with the original nominator. Ted^Talk/_{Contributions} 05:36, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.